FRM·ModuleP1
FRM Part I
Prepare for FRM Part I with FRM practice questions covering 44 topics. Build your knowledge, track your progress, and study effectively with Pass FRM.
What’s in it.
4 units- Unit 01
Foundations of Risk Management
Access: Free tier717 questions · 10 topics - Unit 02
Quantitative Analysis
Access: Premium432 questions · 10 topics - Unit 03
Financial Markets and Products
Access: Premium489 questions · 12 topics - Unit 04
Valuation and Risk Models
Access: Premium500 questions · 12 topics
Sample questions
3 of manyA few questions from this module, with the answer and a full explanation. The complete bank is available when you start practising.
What does gamma measure in the context of option hedging?
- Gamma measures the second-order sensitivity of an option portfolio to interest rate changes; duration-neutral hedges must also be gamma-neutral for complete protection
- Gamma measures the rate of change of an option's price with respect to the passage of time; high gamma means the option loses value quickly as expiry approaches
- Gamma measures the sensitivity of an option's delta to changes in implied volatility; options with high gamma are more sensitive to volatility changes than options with low gamma
- Gamma measures the rate of change of an option's delta with respect to the underlying price; a high gamma means delta changes rapidly as the underlying price movesCorrect answer
ExplanationGamma = ∂Δ/∂S, the second derivative of the option's value with respect to the underlying price. A high gamma means that for a given price move, delta changes substantially, which means the delta hedge requires frequent rebalancing. Long option positions (long calls or long puts) have positive gamma; short option positions have negative gamma. A negative gamma position is particularly dangerous because large price moves in either direction cause losses — the delta hedge falls behind the actual risk as the price moves.
What is tracking error (active risk), and how is it calculated?
- Tracking error is the beta of the portfolio with respect to the benchmark, measuring systematic deviation.
- Tracking error measures how closely the portfolio replicates the benchmark at the position level (not the return level).
- Tracking error is the difference between the portfolio's average return and the benchmark's average return, without squaring or taking standard deviation.
- Tracking error (TE) is the standard deviation of the active return (portfolio return minus benchmark return). TE = , where is the benchmark return.Correct answer
ExplanationActive return = (the return difference between the portfolio and its benchmark). Tracking error = standard deviation of active returns: . A low TE indicates the portfolio closely tracks the benchmark (index fund). A high TE means large deviations from the benchmark. TE is also called 'active risk.' It is used in the information ratio: IR = Active return / Tracking error = , which measures the risk-adjusted value added by active management.
Which of the four coherence axioms does VaR violate, and under what distribution conditions?
- VaR violates monotonicity: a worse outcome in all scenarios does not necessarily produce a higher VaR
- VaR violates translation invariance: adding riskless cash does not in all cases reduce VaR by the cash amount
- VaR violates subadditivity for all distributions, including the normal distribution
- VaR violates subadditivity for non-elliptical loss distributions (e.g., heavy-tailed or skewed credit distributions); it satisfies subadditivity for elliptical distributions such as the normal or t-distributionCorrect answer
ExplanationVaR fails subadditivity specifically for non-elliptical distributions (heavy-tailed, skewed, or distributions with discrete jump components like credit default models). For elliptical distributions (e.g., multivariate normal, student-t), VaR is subadditive because the tail quantiles combine in a predictable way. The subadditivity failure is most pronounced for credit risk (concentrated, jump-to-default) and complex structured products. This is why regulators and academics favour Expected Shortfall (ES), which satisfies all four coherence axioms regardless of the distribution.